International Area Studies Review
[ Article ]
International Area Studies Review - Vol. 28, No. 2, pp.130-146
ISSN: 2233-8659 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Jun 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69473/iasr.2025.28.2.130

Trade Creation and Trade Diversion Effects in ECOWAS

Thomson Assanvo* ; Byung Min Soon**
Chungnam National University: Daejeon, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Chungnam National University: Daejeon, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to: *Email: thomsonassanvo@o.cnu.ac.kr Correspondence to: **Email: soonbm@cnu.ac.kr

Abstract

This study analyzed the trade creation and trade diversion impact on ECOWAS member trade flows and estimated the impact of income per capita differences in the economic area throughout the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU). To do so, we applied the gravity model by adding the square difference in per capita income and trade creation and diversion dummy variables. The results show there is a pure effect of trade creation within the ECOWAS region, and this effect is accompanied to some extent by export diversion. Furthermore, the squared difference in per capita income between the exporting and importing countries is associated with a 0.15% increase in trade. As the coefficient is positive, this suggests that the greater the income difference between the two countries (in both directions), the greater the trade.

Furthermore, the observed disparities in per capita income among ECOWAS members have been shown to encourage trade, thus indicating that policies should be oriented towards the harmonization of the economy in order to stimulate regional trade. It is imperative to acknowledge the considerable impact of income disparities, underscoring the necessity to address economic inequality to ensure the optimal realization of trade benefits within the ECOWAS region. However, relying too much on countries outside the WAEMU could lead to potential welfare losses and better integration is required.

Keywords:

ECOWAS, WAEMU, Trade creation, Trade diversion, Gravity model

AI Acknowledgment

Generative AI or AI-assisted technologies were not used in any way to prepare, write, or complete essential authoring tasks in this manuscript.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2022M3J6A1084843).

References

  • Afesorgbor S. K. and Van Bergeijk P. A. G. (2014). Measuring multi-membership in economic integration and its trade impact: a comparative study of ECOWAS and SADC. South African Journal of Economics, 82, p. 518–530. [https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.12045]
  • Afolabi L. O., Aznin A. B. N. and Izraf A. A. M. (2017). ECOWAS Regional Integration and Trade Effect: A Dynamic Panel Cointegration Method Using the Gravity Model. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11.
  • Afolabi L. O., Bakar N. A. A. and Aziz A. (2016). The Gravity model approach: An Application on the ECOWAS Trading Block. The South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 11. [https://doi.org/10.1515/jeb-2016-0005]
  • African Development Bank. (2003). Review of the Implementation Status of the Trans‐African Highway and the Missing Links, African Development Bank and United Nations Economic Commission for, Africa, Tunis.
  • Ahossey, K. (2024). Do colonial legacy and engagement with China impact the effectiveness of the European aid in promoting democracy in African states? International Area Studies Review, 27(4), 341–352. [https://doi.org/10.69473/iasr.2024.27.1.57]
  • Ali A. A. and Berahab, R. ((2018). Trade Integration in the Economic Community of West African States: Assessing Constraints and Opportunities Using an Augmented Gravity Model. OCP Policy Center.
  • Anderson J. E. and Van Wincoop, E. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American economic review, 93, p. 170–192. [https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455214]
  • Arnon A. and Spivak, A. (1996). Monetary integration between the Israeli, Jordanian and Palestinian economies. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 132, p. 259–277. [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707807]
  • Bakouan M., Boccanfuso D. and others. (2021). General Equilibrium Effects of Trade Liberalization in ECOWAS Countries: Structural Gravity Approach. Modern Economy, 12, p. 274. [https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2021.121014]
  • Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade?. Journal of international Economics, 71(1), 72-95. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.005]
  • Bergstrand, J. H. (1985). The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. The review of economics and statistics, 474-481. [https://doi.org/10.2307/1925976]
  • Brown, A. D., Shin, W.-J., Bae, J. H., & Byeon, J. (2024). Trust, sense of security, and immigration policy preferences of the Kenyan public. International Area Studies Review, 27(4), 401–415. [https://doi.org/10.69473/iasr.2024.27.1.57]
  • Carrère, C. (2006). Revisiting the effects of regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model. European Economic Review, 50(2), 223–247. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.06.001]
  • Coulibaly S. (2004) On the assessment of trade creation and trade diversion effects of developing RTAs. Lausanne: University Lausanne Working paper No45.
  • Deme M. and Ndrianasy E. R. (2017). Trade-creation and trade-diversion effects of regional trade arrangements: Low-income countries. Applied Economics, 49, p. 2188–2202. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1234700]
  • ECOWAS. (2022). ECOWAS 2050 Vision: A regional strategy for inclusive growth and sustainable development. Commission de la CEDEAO. https://ecowap.ecowas.int/media/ecowap/file_document/2021_ECOWAS_2050_Vision_EN.pdf
  • Fajimolu O., Olayemi O. and others. (2023). Analyzing Trade Creation and Trade Diversion effects in ECOWAS Regional Trade Agreement. Business and Entrepreneurial Review, 23, p. 143–156. [https://doi.org/10.25105/ber.v23i1.15307]
  • Isard W. and Peck M. J. (1954). Location theory and international and interregional trade theory. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 68, p. 97–114. [https://doi.org/10.2307/1881920]
  • Krugman P. and others, The move toward free trade zones. (1991) Economic Review, 76 No 6 Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, p. 5
  • Malick, S. (2020). Effects of the Common External Tariff on intra-regional trade: The case of the West African Economic and Monetary Union and the Economic Community of West African States. Studies of Applied Economics, 38(3). [https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v38i3.3282]
  • Martinez-Zarzoso et al., (2003). Augmented gravity model: An empirical application to Mercosur-European Union trade flows. Journal of applied economics, 6, p. 291–316. [https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2003.12040596]
  • Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Nowak-Lehmann, D. F., & Horsewood, N. (2009). Are regional trading agreements beneficial? Static and dynamic panel gravity models. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 20(1), 46–65. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2008.10.001]
  • McCallum J. (1995). National borders matter: Canada-US regional trade patterns. The American economic review, 85, p. 615–623.
  • Olufemi Olabode, O. (2023). Analysing Trade Creation and Trade Diversion Effects in ECOWAS Regional Trade Agreement.
  • Osabuohien E. S. (2019). Bilateral trade performance in West Africa: A gravity model estimation. African Development Review, 31, p. 1–14. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12359]
  • Rogoff, K., & Obstfeld, M. (2000). The six major puzzles in international macroeconomics: is there a common cause?. NBER macroeconomics annual, 15, 339-390. [https://doi.org/10.1086/654423]
  • Seid E. H. (2013). Regional integration and trade in Africa: Augmented gravity model approach. Horn Economic and Social Policy Institute (HESPI).
  • Tinbergen J. (1962). Shaping the world economy. The International Executive, 5, p. 27–30. [https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.5060050113]
  • Venables A. and Limao, N. (1999). Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantage, and Transport Costs. [https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2257]
  • Viner, J. (1950). Customs union theory. NY: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, MIT press.