Vietnam’s Incomplete Middle-Power Identity: The Complexity of the ‘Self’ and ‘Other’

AI Acknowledgment

Generative AI or AI-assisted technologies were not used in any way to prepare, write, or complete essential authoring tasks in this manuscript.

References

• ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations). (2020a). ASEAN coordinating council’s special session on sub-regional development.
• ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations). (2020b). ASEAN forum on sub-regional development: Converging mekong sub-regional cooperation with ASEAN goals.
• ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations). (2020c). Chairman’s statement of the 37th ASEAN summit: Cohesive and responsive.
• Beeson, M., & Higgott, R. (2014). The changing architecture of politics in the Asia-Pacific: Australia’s middle power moment? International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 14(2), 215–237.
• Beneš, V., & Harnisch, S. (2015). Role theory in symbolic interactionism: Czech Republic, Germany and the EU. Cooperation and Conflict, 50(1), 146-165.
• Brown, M., & Zasloff, J. J. (1998). Cambodia confounds the peacemakers, 1979–1998. Cornell University Press.
• Burke, P. J. (1980). The self: Measurement requirements from an interactionist perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(1), 18–29. [https://doi.org/10.2307/3033745]
• Chanda, N. (1986). Brother enemy: The war after the war. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
• Chapnick, A. (1999). The middle power. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 7(2), 73–82. [https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.1999.9673212]
• Cooper, A. F., Higgott, R. A., & Nossal, K. R. (1993). Relocating middle powers: Australia and Canada in a changing world order. UBC Press.
• Cox, R. W. (1996). Approaches to world order. Cambridge University Press.
• CPV (Communist Party of Vietnam). (2001). Documents of the 9th national congress of the communist party of Vietnam.
• CPV (Communist Party of Vietnam). (2003). Resolution No. 08-NQ/TW on defense of the homeland in the new situation.
• CPV (Communist Party of Vietnam). (2016). Documents of the 12th national congress of the communist party of Vietnam.
• CPV (Communist Party of Vietnam). (2021). Documents of the 13th national congress of the communist party of Vietnam.
• Dar, K. B. (2019). Malaysia-Vietnam relations from the 15th to 19th century. Perspektif: Jurnal Sains Sosial Dan Kemanusiaan, 11(1), 1.
• de Swielande, T. S. (2019). Middle powers: A comprehensive definition and typology. In T. S. de Swielande, D. Vandamme, D. Walton, & T. Wilkins (Eds.), Rethinking middle powers in the Asian Century: New theories, new cases (pp. 19–31). Routledge.
• Do, T. T. (Ed.). (2021). Ngoại giao cường quốc tầm trung: Lý thuyết, thực tiễn quốc tế và hàm ý cho Việt Nam [Middle-power diplomacy: Theory, international practice and implications for Vietnam]. NXB Chính trị Quốc gia.
• Dobkowska, J. (2015). Vietnam as ‘a middle power’ on the example of its cooperation with Indo-Chinese countries. Myśl Ekonomiczna i Polityczna, 3(50), 115–140.
• Dommen, A. J. (1979). Laos: Vietnam’s satellite. Current History, 77(452), 201–225.
• Duong, Q. T. (1991). Back to the world recent changes in Vietnamese domestic and foreign policy. Bulletin of Peace Proposals, 22(1), 25–29. [https://doi.org/10.1177/096701069102200103]
• Duy Trinh-Hong Quan. (2020, December 20). Hội thảo “Vai trò thay đổ củ Việ Nam trong thếgiớ đươg đạ” [The changing role of Vietnam in the contemporary world]. VietnamPlus. https://www.vietnamplus.vn/hoi-thao-vai-tro-thay-doi-cua-viet-nam-trong-the-gioi-duong-dai/683187.vnp
• Easley, L.-E. (2012). middle power national identity? South Korea and Vietnam in US-China Geopolitics. Pacific Focus: Inha Journal of International Studies, 27(3), 421–442. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1976-5118.2012.01090.x]
• Elliott, D. W. P. (1983). Vietnam in Asia: Strategy and diplomacy in a new context. International Journal, 38(2), 287–315. [https://doi.org/10.2307/40202141]
• Elliott, D. W. P. (1999). Vietnam: Tradition under challenge. In K. Booth & R. Trood (Eds.), Strategic cultures in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 111–146). Macmillan.
• Emmers, R. (2005a). Regional hegemonies and the exercise of power in Southeast Asia: A study of Indonesia and Vietnam. Asian Survey, 45(4), 645–665.
• Emmers, R. (2005b). The Indochinese enlargement of ASEAN: Security expectations and outcomes. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 59(1), 71–88. [https://doi.org/10.1080/1035771042000332057]
• Emmers, R. (2014). Indonesia’s role in ASEAN: A case of incomplete and sectorial leadership. The Pacific Review, 27(4), 543–562. [https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.924230]
• Emmers, R., & Le, T. H. (2020). Vietnam and the search for security leadership in ASEAN. Asian Security, 1-15. [https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2020.1769068]
• Emmers, R., & Teo, S. (2014). Regional security strategies of middle powers in the Asia-Pacific. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 15(2), 185–216. [https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcu020]
• Emmers, R., & Teo, S. (2018). Security strategies of middle powers in the Asia Pacific. Melbourne University Publishing.
• Evans, G., & Rowley, K. (1990). Red brotherhood at war: Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos since 1975. Verso.
• Fairbank, J. K., & Têng, S. Y. (1941). On The Ch’ing tributary system. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 6(2), 135–246. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2718006]
• Freedman, J. (2016). Status insecurity and temporality in world politics. European Journal of International Relations, 22(4), 797–822.
• Frings, K. V. (1994). Allied and equal: The Kampuchean people’s revolutionary party’s historiography and its relations with Vietnam (1979-1991). Monash University Press.
• Gecelovsky, P. (2009). Constructing a middle power: Ideas and Canadian foreign policy. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 15(1), 77–93. [https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.2009.9673483]
• Glazebrook, G. D. (1947). The middle powers in the United Nations system. International Organization, 1(2), 307–318.
• Grossman, D. (2020, November 2). Vietnam is losing its best friends to China. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2020/11/vietnam-is-losing-its-best-friends-to-china/
• Haas, E. B. (1997). Nationalism, liberalism, and progress: The dismal fate of new nations (Vol. 2). Cornell University Press.
• Haass, R. (2019). How a world order ends: And what comes in its wake. Foreign Affairs, 98(1), 22–30.
• Hoang, A. T. (1993). Why hasn’t Vietnam gained ASEAN membership? Contemporary Southeast Asia, 15(3), 280–291.
• Holsti, K. J. (1970). National role conceptions in the study of foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly, 14(3), 233–309.
• Hopf, T. (1998). The promise of constructivism in international relations theory. International Security, 23(1), 171–200. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2539267]
• Hu, W. (2016). Xi Jinping’s ‘big power diplomacy’ and China’s Central National Security Commission (CNSC). Journal of Contemporary China, 25(98), 163–177. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2015.1075716]
• Hurrell, A. (2000). Some reflections on the role of intermediate powers in international institutions. In A. Hurrell (Ed.), Paths to power: Foreign policy strategies of intermediate states (pp. 1–10). Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
• Hutt, D. (2016, October 20). The truth about anti-Vietnam sentiment in Cambodia. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2016/10/the-truth-about-anti-vietnam-sentiment-in-cambodia/
• Huynh, T. S. (2021, January 1). Should Vietnam embrace middle power status? The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2021/01/should-vietnam-embrace-middle-power-status/
• ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute. (2018). Regional outlook forum 2018.
• Jepperson, R. L., Wendt, A., & Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). Norms, identity, and culture in national security. In P. J. Katzenstein (Ed.), The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics (pp. 33–75). Columbia University Press.
• Jervis, R. (1989). The logic of images in international relations. Columbia University Press.
• Jha, P. K., Doan, T.-T., Quach, T.-H., & Vu, T.-H. (Eds.). (2020). Vietnam: A new middle power in Asia. Shipra Publications.
• Jung, H. (2019). The evolution of social constructivism in political science: Past to present. SAGE Open, 9(1). [https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019832703]
• Kang, D. C. (2010). Hierarchy and legitimacy in international systems: The tribute system in early modern East Asia. Security Studies, 19(4), 591–622. [https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2010.524079]
• Kang, D. C. (2020). International order in historical east asia: tribute and hierarchy beyond sinocentrism and eurocentrism. International Organization, 74(1), 65–93. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818319000274]
• Karim, M. F. (2018). Middle power, status-seeking and role conceptions: The cases of Indonesia and South Korea. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 72(4), 343–363. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2018.1443428]
• Kim, S. Y. (2021, June 7). How South Korea can upgrade its strategic partnership with Vietnam. Korea Economic Institute of America. https://keia.org/the-peninsula/how-south-korea-can-upgrade-its-strategic-partnership-with-vietnam/
• Kowert, P. A. (2010). Foreign policy and the social construction of state identity. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. [https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.397]
• Kratiuk, B. (2014, July 14–15). Vietnam as a middle power in Southeast Asia. The 2nd International Conference on Asian Studies (ICAS 2014), Colombo, Sri Lanka.
• Le, Dinh Tinh (2017). Bàn về tư duy chiến lược: Lý thuyết, thực tiễn và trường hợp Việt Nam [Strategic thinking: Theory, practice and the case of Vietnam]. Tạp Chí Nghiên Cứu Quốc Tế, 4(111), 17–35.
• Le, Dinh Tinh (2018). The middle power goal and Vietnam’s diplomatic outlook beyond 2030. International Studies, 39, 5–38.
• Le, Dinh Tinh (2019). Vietnam as an emerging middle power towards 2030 and beyond. The Russian Journal of Vietnamese Studies, 3(3), 7–17. [https://doi.org/10.24411/2618-9453-2019-10023]
• Le, Dinh Tinh & Hoang, Long (2019, August 31). Middle powers, joining together: The case of Vietnam and Australia. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2019/08/middle-powers-joining-together-the-case-of-vietnam-and-australia/
• Le, Dinh Tinh, & Vu, T. T. N. (2020). Khái niệm cường quốc tầm trung và liên hệ với Việt Nam [The concept of a middle power and Vietnamese context]. Tạp Chí Lý Luận Chính Trị, 3, 123–129.
• Le, Dinh Tinh, & Vu, T. T. N. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic and the emergence of Vietnam as a middle power. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 41(2), 303–325. [https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034211057569]
• Le, H. H. (2018, August 17). TS. Lê Hồng Hiệp: Đến lúc Việt Nam định vị mình là “cường quốc hạng trung” [It’s time for Vietnam to position itself as a middle power]. The World and Vietnam. https://baoquocte.vn/ts-le-hong-hiep-den-luc-viet-nam-dinh-vi-minh-la-cuong-quoc-hang-trung-76060.html
• Lee, S.-J., Chun, C., Suh, H., & Thomsen, P. (2015). Middle power in action: The evolving nature of diplomacy in the age of multilateralism (EAI MPDI Special Report). East Asia Institute.
• Leifer, M. (1967). Cambodia: The search for security. Praeger.
• Levine, C. (2003). Introduction: Structure, development, and identity formation. Identity, 3(3), 191–195. [https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532706XID0303_01]
• Li, S. (2014). 3 China’s dual-identity dilemma and its countermeasures. In B. Shao (Ed.), The world in 2020 according to China (pp. 51–68). BRILL.
• Li, T., & Zuo, R. (2019). On the middle-ranking power goals and diplomatic vision of Vietnam after 2030. China National Knowledge Infrastructure. http://61.181.120.82:8080/kcms/detail/detailall.aspx?filename=dnya201903005&dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFD2019
• Manicom, J., & Reeves, J. (2014). Locating middle powers in international relations theory and power transitions. In B. Gilley & A. O’Neil (Eds.), Middle powers and the rise of China (pp. 23–44). Georgetown University Press.
• Mares, D. R. (1988). Middle powers under regional hegemony: To challenge or acquiesce in hegemonic enforcement. International Studies Quarterly, 32(4), 453–471. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2600593]
• Ministry of National Defense. (2019). 2019 Vietnam national defense white paper. National Political Publishing House.
• Neack, L. (2000, March 14–18). Middle powers once removed: The diminished global role of middle powers and American grand strategy. The 41st Annual Convention of the International Studies Association (ISA), Los Angeles, CA.
• Neack, L. (2003). The new foreign policy: U.S. and comparative foreign policy in the 21st century. Rowman & Littlefield.
• Nguyen, D. T. (2016). The United States and Vietnam relationship: Benefits and challenges for Vietnam [Unpublished master’s thesis]. U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, KS.
• Nguyen, V. P., & Vu, K. (2019, February 22). The Trump-Kim summit show will yield positive results—For Vietnam. The National Interest. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/trump-kim-summit-show-will-yield-positive-results%E2%80%94-vietnam-45362
• Nossal, K. R., & Stubbs, R. (1997). Mahathir’s Malaysia: An emerging middle power? In A. F. Cooper (Ed.), Niche diplomacy: Middle powers after the Cold War (pp. 147–163). Palgrave Macmillan. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25902-1_8]
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2019). FDI regulatory restrictiveness index. https://www.oecd.org/investment/fdiindex.htm
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2023). Trade facilitation indicators simulator. http://www.oecd.org/southeast-asia/data/trade.htm
• Park, J.-W., Shin, G.-W., & Keyser, D. (Eds.). (2013). Asia’s middle powers?: The identity and regional policy of South Korea and Vietnam. The Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center.
• Party Central Committee’s Secretariat. (2018). Directive No. 25-CT/TW of the party central committee’s secretariat on promoting and enhancing the role of multilateral diplomacy to 2030.
• Patience, A. (2014). Imagining middle powers. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 68(2), 210–224. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2013.840557]
• Paul, T. V., Larson, D. W., & Wohlforth, W. C. (Eds.). (2014). Status in world politics. Cambridge University Press.
• Phan, X. D. (2021, March 3). Vietnam’s Mekong middle power diplomacy. Fulcrum. https://fulcrum.sg/vietnams-mekong-middle-power-diplomacy/
• Ping, J. H. (2005). Middle power statecraft: Indonesia, Malaysia and the Asia Pacific. Ashgate.
• Politburo of the CPV (Communist Party of Vietnam). (1988). Resolution No. 13.
• Pomfret, J. (2010, July 30). U.S. takes a tougher tone with China. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/29/AR2010072906416.html
• Pongsudhirak, T. (2020, February 14). Vietnam to counter China with ASEAN backing on Mekong river region. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/panel-of-economic-commentators/2020/02/14/vietnam-to-counter-china-with-asean-backing-on-mekong-river-region/#6aefff155ff3
• Pratt, C. (1990). Has middle power internationalism a future? In C. Pratt (Ed.), Middle power international: The north-south dimension (pp. 143–167). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
• Pu, X. (2017). Controversial identity of a rising China. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 10(2), 131–149. [https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pox004]
• Robertson, J. (2017). Middle-power definitions: Confusion reigns supreme. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 71(4), 355–370. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2017.1293608]
• Shin, D.-M. (2015). A critical review of the concept of middle power. E-International Relations, 4.
• Shin, S. (2016). South Korea’s elusive middlepowermanship: Regional or global player? The Pacific Review, 29(2), 187–209.
• Sim, D., & Lee, L. (2019, June 6). Hun Sen accuses Singapore PM Lee Hsien Loong of ‘supporting genocide’ as war of words over Cambodia’s Khmer Rouge-era escalates. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3013336/did-vietnam-invade-cambodia-or-save-it-singapore-pm-lee-hsien
• Stuart‐Fox, M. (2008). Laos: A small state involved in neighbour’s conflict. The Round Table, 71(282), 163– 169. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00358538108453514]
• Teo, S. (2018). Middle power identities of Australia and South Korea: Comparing the Kevin Rudd/Julia Gillard and Lee Myung-bak administrations. The Pacific Review, 31(2), 221–239.
• Teo, S. (2022). Toward a differentiation-based framework for middle power behavior. International Theory, 14(1), 1–24. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971920000688]
• The New York Times. (1984, December 29). Vietnam dissolves its subjects. https://www.nytimes.com/1984/12/29/opinion/vietnam-dissolves-its-subjects.html
• Thies, C. G. (2012). International socialization processes vs. Israeli national role conceptions: Can role theory integrate IR theory and foreign policy analysis? Foreign Policy Analysis, 8(1), 25–46.
• Thies, C. G., & Sari, A. C. (2018). A role theory approach to middle powers: Making sense of Indonesia’s place in the international system. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 40(3), 397–421.
• To, M. T., & Vu, T. T. N. (2020). Water security: Theoretical and practical issues in the Mekong subregion. International Studies, 42, 211–234.
• Tran, P. T., Vieira, A. V. G., & Ferreira-Pereira, L. C. (2013). Vietnam’s strategic hedging vis-à-vis China: The roles of the European Union and Russia. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 56(1), 163–182. [https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292013000100009]
• Truong, Minh Vu, & Heydarian, R. J. (2015, April 9). The tragedy of small power politics: Vietnam, the Philippines, and the great powers. cogitASIA CSIS Asia Policy Blog. http://www.cogitasia.com/the-tragedy-of-small-power-politics-vietnam-the-philippines-and-the-great-powers/
• Ungerer, C., & Smith, S. (2010). Australia and South Korea: Midddle power cooperation and Asian security. Australian Strategic Policy Institute.
• Vo, T. T. (2015). Vietnam’s perspectives on regional economic integration. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 32(1), 106–124.
• VTV (Vietnam Television). (2020, December 21). Chuyên gia Nga: Việt Nam xứng đáng là một “cường quốc tầm trung” [Russian expert: Vietnam deserves to be a “middle power”]. https://vtv.vn/chinh-tri/chuyen-gia-nga-viet-nam-xung-dang-la-mot-cuong-quoc-tam-trung-20201221070817287.htm
• Vu, L. T. H., & Do, T. T. (2019). International mediation and middle powers implications for Vietnam. International Studies, 40, 5–30.
• Vu, T. T. N. (2022). The Mekong issue on Asean’s agenda and Vietnam’s middle-power diplomacy. The Russian Journal of Vietnamese Studies, 6(1), 17–27. [https://doi.org/10.54631/VS.2022.61-105007]
• Vu, T. T. N., & Le, D. T. (2020). Hoạch địh chiế lượ đố ngoạ: Lýthuyế, thự tiễ vàhà ýnghiê cứ cho Việt Nam trong bối cảnh hội nhập quốc tế sâu rộng [Foreign affairs strategic planning: Theory, practice and implications for Vietnam in the extensive international integration]. Tạp Chí Nghiên Cứu Quốc Tế, 3(122), 15–44.
• Vu, T. T. N., & Le, D. T. (2023). A two-level game approach to Hanoi’s foreign policy proactivism. Asian Perspective, 47(1), 121–144. [https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2023.0005]
• Wah, C. K. (2000). Reflections on the shaping of strategic cultures in Southeast Asia. In D. da Cunha (Ed.), Southeast Asian perspectives on security (pp. 1–19). ISEAS Publishing. [https://doi.org/10.1355/9789812307064-004]
• Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425.
• Wendt, A. (1994). Collective identity formation and the international state. American Political Science Review, 88(2), 384–396.
• Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press.
• Wight, M. (1977). Systems of states. Leicester University Press.
• Wilkins, T. S. (2018). Defining middle powers through IR theory: Three images. In T. S. de Swielande, D. Vandamme, D. Walton, & T. Wilkins (Eds.), Rethinking middle powers in the Asian Century: New theories, new cases (pp. 45–61). Routledge.
• Williams, P. A. (2011). Turkey’s water diplomacy: A theoretical discussion. In A. Kibaroglu, W. Scheumann, & A. Kramer (Eds.), Turkey’s water policy (pp. 197–214). Springer.
• Womack, B. (2006). China and Vietnam: The politics of asymmetry. Cambridge University Press.
• Yilmaz, Ş. (2017). Middle powers and Regional Powers. Oxford Bibliographies. [https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199743292-0222]
• Zagoria, D. S. (1997). Joining ASEAN. In J. W. Morley & M. Nishihara (Eds.), Vietnam joins the world (pp. 154–172). Routledge.
• Zartman, I. W., & Touval, S. (1985). International mediation: Conflict resolution and power politics. Journal of Social Issues, 41(2), 27–45. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb00853.x]