International Area Studies Review
[ Article ]
International Area Studies Review - Vol. 28, No. 4, pp.405-423
ISSN: 2233-8659 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Dec 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69473/iasr.2025.28.4.405

City-Driven Regionalism in Asia: From Nation-State Limits to Urban Leadership

Hyun-Chool Lee*
Political Science Department, Konkuk University, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to: *Email: lhc0609@konkuk.ac.kr

Abstract

As transboundary challenges such as climate change, pandemics, and large-scale disasters intensify, the limits of nation-state–centered governance have become increasingly evident—particularly in Asia, where supranational integration remains politically constrained. This paper proposes an alternative model of cooperation: city-driven regionalism. In particular, the rise of shrinking and rapidly ageing societies across Asia adds a demographic imperative for deeper, city-level cooperation, as many of the region’s most acute challenges—care systems, labor shortages, and fiscal sustainability—are now fundamentally urban and transboundary in nature.

Grounded in theories of multilevel governance, city diplomacy, and comparative regionalism, the study develops a conceptual framework that repositions cities as both horizontal connectors, fostering peer-to-peer innovation and solidarity, and vertical translators, linking local action with national and global agendas. Drawing on global initiatives such as the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, the ASEAN Smart Cities Network, and the EU’s BiodiverCities program, the paper illustrates how transnational municipal networks enable cities to institutionalize sustainability cooperation.

Building on these insights, it outlines a governance model for a prospective Asian city community, featuring a City Charter, rotating City Assembly, Urban Secretariat, Thematic Clusters, Climate Impact Index, and Solidarity Fund. While respecting national sovereignty, the model promotes regional resilience, policy innovation, and bottom-up climate action. Conceptual in scope, the study provides a foundation for future empirical research and offers a distinctive Asian pathway for city-led regional governance.

Keywords:

City diplomacy, Multilevel governance, Transnational municipal networks, Urban climate governance, population ageing, Urban resilience, Asian regionalism

Acknowledgments

I would like to express my gratitude to Mr. Yoji Sato, Chairman of the Eurasia Foundation (from Asia), for providing significant inspiration for this paper.

AI Acknowledgment

Generative AI or AI-assisted technologies were not used in any way to prepare, write, or complete essential authoring tasks in this manuscript.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2025S1A5C2A02022297).

References

  • Acharya, A. (2007). The emerging regional architecture of world politics. World Politics, 59(4), 629–652. [https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2008.0000]
  • Acuto, M. (2013). Global cities, governance and diplomacy: The urban link. Routledge. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203073810]
  • ASEAN Secretariat. (2021). ASEAN smart cities network: Progress and opportunities. https://asean.org
  • Börzel, T. (2016). From EU governance of crisis to crisis of EU governance: Regulatory failure, redistributive conflict and Eurosceptic publics. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(S1), 8–31. [https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12431]
  • Bulkeley, H. (2005). Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks. Political Geography, 24(8), 875–902. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.07.002]
  • C40 Cities. (2023). About C40. https://www.c40.org
  • Hettne, B., Inotai, A., & Sunkel, O. (1999). Globalism and the new regionalism, Vol. 1. Palgrave Macmillan. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27268-6]
  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level governance and European integration. Rowman & Littlefield. [https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216401537]
  • Hoshiro, H. (2019). Does regionalization promote regionalism? Evidence from East Asia. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 8(2), 199–219. [https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2019.1693944]
  • Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 389–401. [https://doi.org/10.1068/d9107]
  • Jetschke, A., & Lenz, T. (2013). Does regionalism diffuse? A new research agenda for the study of regional organizations. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(4), 626–637. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.762186]
  • Jonas, A. E. G., & Moisio, S. (2016). City regionalism as geopolitical processes: A new framework for analysis: A new framework for analysis. Progress in Human Geography, 42(3), 350–370. (Original work published 2018) [https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516679897]
  • Keating, M. (2008). A quarter century of the Europe of the regions. Regional & Federal Studies, 18(5), 629–635. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560802351630]
  • Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1974). Transgovernmental relations and international organizations. World Politics, 27(1), 39–62. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2009925]
  • Lee, H.-C. (2010). Ratification of a free trade agreement: The Korean legislature’s response to globalization. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 40(2), 291–308. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00472331003600507]
  • Lee, H.-C. (2021). Population aging and Korean society. Korea Journal, 61(2), 5–20. [https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2021.61.2.5]
  • Lee, H.-C. (2025). Beyond the demographic cliff: Designing a new social contract in a shrinking society. IMK.
  • Lee, H.-C., Moon, H. A., Shin, B. R., Park, S. D., Choi, H. S., Shin, J. H., Park, J. S., Jung, J. H., Kim, S. C., Bae, Y. J., & Park, I. H. (2021). Theory of the Asian community. Konkuk University Press.
  • Musch, A., van der Valk, C., Sizoo, A., & Tajbakhsh, K. (Eds.) (2008). City diplomacy: The role of local governments in conflict prevention, peace-building, post-conflict reconstruction. https://www.uclg.org
  • Pejic, D., Kling, S., Leavesley, A., Klaus, I., Trijsburg, I., Kosovac, A., & Acuto, M. (2025). City diplomacy in response to multiple crises: The 2024 Cities and International Engagement Survey. Melbourne Centre for Cities.
  • Risse-Kappen, T. (Ed.). (1995). Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598760]
  • Saaler, S., & Szpilman, C. W. A. (Eds.) (2011). Pan-Asianism: A documentary history, Vol. 1: 1850–1920. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. [https://doi.org/10.5040/9798881815684.ch-I]
  • Scholte, J. (2005). Globalization: A critical introduction. Palgrave. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-21207-7]
  • Tavares, R. (2016). Paradiplomacy: Cities and states as global players. Oxford University Press.
  • UN-Habitat. (2020). The new urban agenda. https://unhabitat.org/the-new-urban-agenda-illustrated
  • van der Pluijm, R., & Melissen, J. (2007). City diplomacy: The expanding role of cities in international politics. Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael.
  • Zulian, G., Marando, F., Vogt, P., Barbero Vignola, G., Babí Almenar, J., Zurbaran Nucci, M., & Prince, K. (2022). BiodiverCities: A roadmap to enhance the biodiversity and green infrastructure of European cities by 2030. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/21172 [https://doi.org/10.2760/21172]