International Area Studies Review
[ Article ]
International Area Studies Review - Vol. 27, No. 4, pp.416-433
ISSN: 2233-8659 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Dec 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69473/iasr.2024.27.4.416

Maritime Claims and Conflict Management in Multilateral Alliances

Won-June Hwang* ; Ji-Hong Park
Korea National Defense University, Republic of Korea
Korea National Defense University, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to: *Email: hwj900126@naver.com

Abstract

Since the 1950s, the number of maritime claims has increased significantly, becoming a major source of militarized international disputes. This paper explores the design of alliances for the peaceful management of maritime claims. We argue that multilateral alliances enhance the likelihood of peaceful negotiations over maritime claims among member states. We test this hypothesis using logistic models, penalized maximum likelihood models, and linear probability models with fixed effect. Our findings support our argument, demonstrating the robust pacifying effects of multilateral alliances, especially in managing maritime claims.

Keywords:

Maritime claims, Multilateral alliance, Intra-alliance conflict, Conflict management, Alliance design

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express appreciation for Professor Sookyoun Lee of the Korea National Defense University and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments.

AI Acknowledgment

Generative AI or AI-assisted technologies were not used in any way to prepare, write, or complete essential authoring tasks in this manuscript.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  • Ásgeirsdóttir, Á., & Steinwand, M. (2015). Dispute settlement mechanisms and maritime boundary settlements. The Review of International Organizations, 10(2), 119–143. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-015-9217-9]
  • Ásgeirsdóttir, Á., & Steinwand, M. C. (2018). Distributive outcomes in contested maritime areas: The role of inside options in settling competing claims. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(6), 1284–1313. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002716677568]
  • Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books.
  • Axelrod, R., & Keohane, R. O. (1985). Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions. World Politics, 38(1), 226–254. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2010357]
  • Baker, J. S., & Byers, M. (2012). Crossed lines: The curious case of the Beaufort Sea maritime boundary dispute. Ocean Development & International Law, 43(1), 70–95. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2012.647509]
  • Bearce, D. H., Flanagan, K. M., & Floros, K. M. (2006). Alliances, internal information, and military conflict among member-states. International Organization, 60(3), 595–625. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818306060188]
  • Beck, N. (2020). Estimating grouped data models with a binary-dependent variable and fixed effects via a logit versus a linear probability model: The impact of dropped units. Political Analysis, 28(1), 139– 145. [https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2019.20]
  • Bennett, D. S., & Stam, A. C. (2004). The behavioral origins of war. University of Michigan Press. [https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23490]
  • Benoit, K. (1996). Democracies really are more pacific (in general): Reexamining regime type and war involvement. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40(4), 636–657. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002796040004006]
  • Benson, B. V., & Clinton, J. D. (2016). Assessing the variation of formal military alliances. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 60(5), 866–898. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002714560348]
  • Bercovitch, J., & Schneider, G. (2000). Who mediates? the political economy of international conflict management. Journal of Peace Research, 37(2), 145–165. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343300037002002]
  • Blyschak, P. M. (2013). Offshore oil and gas projects amid maritime border disputes: Applicable law. The Journal of World Energy Law & Business, 6(3), 210–233. [https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwt008]
  • Boehmer, C., Gartzke, E., & Nordstrom, T. (2004). Do intergovernmental organizations promote peace? World Politics, 57(1), 1–38. [https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2005.0008]
  • Bremer, S. A. (1992). Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816-1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36(2), 309-341. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002792036002005]
  • Brenner, S. (2012). Military coalitions in war and peace: NATO and the Greek-Turkish conflict 1952-1989. Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, 14(3).
  • Caporaso, J. A. (1992). International relations theory and multilateralism: The search for foundations. International Organization, 46(3), 599–632. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027843]
  • Carter, D. B., & Signorino, C. S. (2010). Back to the future: Modeling time dependence in binary data. Political Analysis, 18(3), 271–292. [https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpq013]
  • Chen, X., Xu, Q., & Li, L. (2023). Illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing governance in disputed maritime areas: Reflections on the international legal obligations of states. Fishes, 8(1), 36. [https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8010036]
  • Daniels, K., & Mitchell, S. M. (2017). Bones of democratic contention: Maritime disputes. International Area Studies Review, 20(4), 293–310. [https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865917740269]
  • Fearon, J. D. (1995). Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization, 49(3), 379–414. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033324]
  • Firth, D. (1993). Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika, 80(1), 27–38. [https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/80.1.27]
  • Fundenberg, D., & Maskin, E. (1990). Evolution and cooperation in noisy repeated games. The American Economic Review, 80(2), 274–279.
  • Geller, D. S. (1993). Power differentials and war in rival dyads. International Studies Quarterly, 37(2), 173–193. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2600767]
  • Gibler, D. M., & Sewell, J. A. (2006). External threat and democracy: The role of NATO revisited. Journal of Peace Research, 43(4), 413–431. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343306065115]
  • Gibler, D. M., & Tir, J. (2013). Territorial peace and democratic clustering. The Journal of Politics, 76(1), 27–40. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613001059]
  • Gleditsch, N. P., & Hegre, H. (1997). Peace and democracy: Three levels of analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(2), 283–310. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002797041002004]
  • Goddard, S. E. (2006). Uncommon ground: Indivisible territory and the politics of legitimacy. International Organization, 60(1), 35–68. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818306060024]
  • Hansen, H. E., Mitchell, S. M., & Nemeth, S. C. (2008). IO mediation of interstate conflicts: Moving beyond the global versus regional dichotomy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(2), 295–325. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002707313693]
  • Hayes, A. F., & Cai, L. (2007). Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 709– 722. [https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192961]
  • Hensel, P. R. (2001). Contentious issues and world politics: The management of territorial claims in the Americas, 1816-1992. International Studies Quarterly, 45(1), 81–109. [https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00183]
  • Hensel, P. R., & Mitchell, S. M. (2005). Issue indivisibility and territorial claims. GeoJournal, 64(4), 275– 285. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-005-5803-3]
  • Hensel, P. R., & Mitchell, S. M. (2017). From territorial claims to identity claims: The Issue Correlates of War (ICOW) Project. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 34(2), 126–140. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894216652160]
  • Hensel, P. R., McLaughlin Mitchell, S., Sowers, T. E., & Thyne, C. L. (2008). Bones of contention: Comparing territorial, maritime, and river issues. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(1), 117–143. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002707310425]
  • Johnson, J. C. (2022). Designing alliances: How adversaries provoke peacetime military coordination. International Interactions, 48(1), 49–74. [https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2021.1973453]
  • Johnson, J. C., & Leeds, B. A. (2011). Defense pacts: A prescription for peace? Foreign Policy Analysis, 7(1), 45–65. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2010.00122.x]
  • Kadercan, B. (2017). Nationalism and war for territory: From ‘divisible’ territories to inviolable homelands. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 30(4), 368–393. [https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2018.1437598]
  • Keohane, R. O. (1986). Reciprocity in international relations. International Organization, 40(1), 1–27. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300004458]
  • Keohane, R. O. (1989). International institutions and state power: Essays in international relations theory. Routledge.
  • King, G., & Zeng, L. (2001). Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis, 9(2), 137–163. [https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a004868]
  • Kinne, B. J. (2013). IGO membership, network convergence, and credible signaling in militarized disputes. Journal of Peace Research, 50(6), 659–676. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343313498615]
  • Krebs, R. R. (1999). Perverse institutionalism: NATO and the Greco-Turkish conflict. International Organization, 53(2), 343–377. [https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899550904]
  • Lathrop, C. G. (2007). International Court of Justice (ICJ): Territorial and maritime dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea. International Legal Materials, 46(6), 1050–1118. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020782900032265]
  • Leeds, B. A. (2003). Do alliances deter aggression? The influence of military alliances on the initiation of militarized interstate disputes. American Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 427–439. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00031]
  • Leeds, B. A., & Anac, S. (2005). Alliance institutionalization and alliance performance. International Interactions, 31(3), 183–202. [https://doi.org/10.1080/03050620500294135]
  • Leeds, B. A., Ritter, J., Mitchell, S., & Long, A. (2002). Alliance treaty obligations and provisions, 1815– 1944. International Interactions, 28(3), 237–260. [https://doi.org/10.1080/03050620213653]
  • Long, A. G., Nordstrom, T., & Baek, K. (2007). Allying for peace: Treaty obligations and conflict between allies. The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 1103–1117. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00611.x]
  • Long, J. S., & Ervin, L. H. (2000). Using heteroscedasticity consistent standard errors in the linear regression model. The American Statistician, 54(3), 217–224. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2685594]
  • Lupu, Y., & Poast, P. (2016). Team of former rivals: A multilateral theory of non-aggression pacts. Journal of Peace Research, 53(3), 344–358. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343316630782]
  • Manicom, J. (2014). Bridging troubled waters: China, Japan, and maritime order in the East China Sea. Georgetown University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1353/book29266]
  • Marshall, M., Jaggers, K., & Gurr, T. (2020). Polity5: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800- 2018. Center for Systemic Peace.
  • Martin, L. L. (1992). Interests, power, and multilateralism. International Organization, 46(4), 765–792. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033245]
  • Mattes, M. (2012). Reputation, symmetry, and alliance design. International Organization, 66(4), 679–707. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081831200029X]
  • Mattes, M., & Vonnahme, G. (2010). Contracting for peace: Do nonaggression pacts reduce conflict? The Journal of Politics, 72(4), 925–938. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000447]
  • Melin, M. M. (2011). The impact of state relationships on if, when, and how conflict management occurs. International Studies Quarterly, 55(3), 691–715. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00665.x]
  • Mitchell, S. M. (2002). A Kantian system? Democracy and third-party conflict resolution. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 749–759. [https://doi.org/10.2307/3088431]
  • Mitchell, S. M. (2020). Clashes at sea: Explaining the onset, militarization, and resolution of diplomatic maritime claims. Security Studies, 29(4), 637–670. [https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2020.1811458]
  • Mitchell, S. M., & Hensel, P. R. (2007). International institutions and compliance with agreements. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 721–737. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00277.x]
  • Mitchell, S. M., & Prins, B. C. (1999). Beyond territorial contiguity: Issues at stake in democratic militarized interstate disputes. International Studies Quarterly, 43(1), 169–183. [https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00115]
  • Morrow, J. D. (1994). Alliances, credibility, and peacetime costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38(2), 270–297. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002794038002005]
  • Morrow, J. D. (2000). Alliances: Why write them down? Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 63–83. [https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.63]
  • Nemeth, S. C., Mitchell, S. M., Nyman, E. A., & Hensel, P. R. (2014). Ruling the sea: Managing maritime conflicts through UNCLOS and exclusive economic zones. International Interactions, 40(5), 711–736. [https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2014.897233]
  • Oneal, J. R., & Russett, B. (2001). Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Owsiak, A. P., & Frazier, D. V. (2014). The conflict management efforts of allies in interstate disputes. Foreign Policy Analysis, 10(3), 243–264. [https://doi.org/10.1111/fpa.12011]
  • Owsiak, A. P., & Mitchell, S. M. (2019). Conflict management in land, river, and maritime claims. Political Science Research and Methods, 7(1), 43–61. [https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2016.56]
  • Oye, K. A. (1985). Explaining cooperation under anarchy: Hypotheses and strategies. World Politics, 38(1), 1–24. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2010349]
  • Poast, P. (2010). (Mis)using dyadic data to analyze multilateral events. Political Analysis, 18(4), 403–425. [https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpq024]
  • Powell, E. J., & Mitchell, S. M. (2022). Forum shopping for the best adjudicator: Dispute settlement in the United Nations convention on the law of the sea. The Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies, 9(1), 7–33.
  • Powell, R. (2006). War as a commitment problem. International Organization, 60(01), 169–203. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818306060061]
  • Rixen, T. (2010). Bilateralism or multilateralism? The political economy of avoiding international double taxation. European Journal of International Relations, 16(4), 589–614. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109346891]
  • Ruggie, J. G. (1992). Multilateralism: The anatomy of an institution. International Organization, 46(3), 561–598. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027831]
  • Ryou-Ellison, H. J., & Gold, A. (2020). Moral hazard at sea: How alliances actually increase low-level maritime provocations between allies. International Interactions, 46(1), 111–132. [https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2020.1688804]
  • Schultz, K. A. (2017). Mapping interstate territorial conflict: A new data set and applications. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(7), 1565–1590. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002715620470]
  • Senese, P. D., & Vasquez, J. A. (2008). The steps to war: An empirical study. Princeton University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400837830]
  • Singer, J. D. (1988). Reconstructing the Correlates of War Dataset on Material Capabilities of States, 1816– 1985. International Interactions, 14(2), 115–132. [https://doi.org/10.1080/03050628808434695]
  • Singer, J. D., Bremer, S., & Stuckey, J. (1972). Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820–1965. In Bruce Russett (Ed.), Peace, War, and Numbers (pp. 19–48). Sage, 19–48.
  • Smith, A. (1995). Alliance formation and war. International Studies Quarterly, 39(4), 405–425. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2600800]
  • Snyder, G. H. (1990). Alliance theory: A neorealist first cut. Journal of International Affairs, 44(1), 103–123.
  • Song, Y. (1997). The Canada‐European union turbot dispute in the northwest Atlantic: An application of the incident approach. Ocean Development & International Law, 28(3), 269–311. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00908329709546106]
  • Steinsson, S. (2018). Do liberal ties pacify? A study of the Cod Wars. Cooperation and Conflict, 53(3), 339–355. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836717712293]
  • Timoneda, J. C. (2021). Estimating group fixed effects in panel data with a binary dependent variable: How the LPM outperforms logistic regression in rare events data. Social Science Research, 93, 102486. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102486]
  • Toft, M. D. (2002). Indivisible territory, geographic concentration, and ethnic war. Security Studies, 12(2), 82–119. [https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410212120010]
  • Trinidad, J. (2016). The disputed waters around Gibraltar. British Yearbook of International Law, 86(1), 101–154. [https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/brx007]
  • UNCLOS, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982).
  • Vasquez, J. A. (1993). The war puzzle. Cambridge University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511583483]
  • Vasquez, J. A. (2009). The war puzzle revisited. Cambridge University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627224]
  • Weitsman, P. A. (1997). Intimate enemies: The politics of peacetime alliances. Security Studies, 7(1), 156– 193. [https://doi.org/10.1080/09636419708429337]
  • Weitsman, P. A. (2003). Dangerous alliances: Proponents of peace, weapons of war. Stanford University Press.
  • Weitsman, P. A. (2013). Waging war: Alliances, coalitions, and institutions of interstate violence. Stanford University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804788946]
  • White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838. [https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934]
  • Wiegand, K. E. (2014). Mediation in territorial, maritime and river disputes. International Negotiation, 19(2), 343–370. [https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-12341281]
  • Wright, T. M., & Rider, T. J. (2014). Disputed territory, defensive alliances and conflict initiation. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 31(2), 119–144. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894213503440]