Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
International Area Studies Review
[ Article ]
International Area Studies Review - Vol. 27, No. 2, pp.95-121
ISSN: 2233-8659 (Print)
Print publication date 01 Jun 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69473/iasr.2024.27.2.95

Estimating the Extensive Margin of Exports in the Chinese Market: The Impact of Digital Trade Facilitation on Export Diversification

Wanting Ouyang ; Innwon Park*
Graduate School of International Studies, Korea University, Republic of Korea
Division of International Studies, Korea University, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to: *Email: iwpark@korea.ac.kr

Abstract

This study investigates the causal relationship between digital trade facilitation (DTF) and export diversification, as measured by the extensive margin (EM) of exports in the Chinese market. Findings from a preceding textual analysis of regional trade agreements (RTAs) indicate that high-income countries tend to exhibit better trade performance by engaging in deeper RTAs that have more comprehensive coverage of DTF provisions. Based on our analysis using various gravity regression models, we assert that the implementation of DTF significantly enhances the extensive margin of exports. Our analysis of mediating effects confirms that e-commerce expansion plays a crucial role in amplifying the positive impact of DTF on export diversification within the Chinese market. Furthermore, our findings indicate that the development of DTF and e-commerce is not solely limited by economic size and technology level. Consequently, we strongly encourage small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in developing countries to proactively enhance their DTF capabilities to effectively utilize their RTA network.

Keywords:

Digital trade facilitation, Export diversification, Extensive margin of exports, e-commerce, China

AI Acknowledgment

Generative AI or AI-assisted technologies were not used in any way to prepare, write, or complete essential authoring tasks in this manuscript.

Conflict of Interests

The author(s) declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

The author(s) declare that there is no funding.

References

  • Adomako, S., Amankwah-Amoah, J., Tarba, S. Y., & Khan, Z. (2021). Perceived corruption, business process digitization, and SMEs’ degree of internationalization in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Business Research, 123(2), 196–207. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.065]
  • Ahmed, F. U., & Brennan, L. (2019). An institution-based view of firms’ early internationalization: Effectiveness of national export promotion policies. International Marketing Review, 36(5), 911–954. [https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-03-2018-0108]
  • Almeida, F., Santos, J. D., & Monteiro, J. A. (2020). The challenges and opportunities in the digitalization of companies in a post-COVID-19 world. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 48(3), 97–103. [https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2020.3013206]
  • Berthou, A., & Fontagné, L. (2008). The Euro and the intensive and extensive margins of trade: Evidence from French firm level data. SSRN. [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1194963]
  • Breinlich, H., Corradi, V., Rocha, N., Ruta, M., Santos Silva, J. M. C., & Zylkin, T. (2021). Machine learning in international trade research - Evaluating the impact of trade agreements (CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP17325). SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4121518 [https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9629]
  • Broda, C., & Weinstein, D. E. (2006). Globalization and the gains from variety. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 541-585. [https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.541]
  • CCG (Center for China and Globalization). (2021). B2C Cross-border e-commerce platform “go global” research report. http://www.ccg.org.cn/archives/63453
  • Chaney, T. (2008). Distorted gravity: The intensive and extensive margins of international trade. American Economic Review, 98(4), 1707-1721. [https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.4.1707]
  • Dennis, A., & Shepherd, B. (2011). Trade facilitation and export diversification. The World Economy, 34(1), 101–122. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2010.01303.x]
  • Dür A., Baccini, L., & Elsig, M. (2014). The design of international trade agreements: Introducing a new dataset. The Review of International Organizations, 9(3), 353–375. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-013-9179-8]
  • Duval, Y., Utoktham, C., & Kravchenko, A. (2018). Impact of implementation of digital trade facilitation on trade costs (ARTNeT Working Paper Series No. 174). ESCAP. [https://doi.org/10.18356/f8b8c7ac-en]
  • Eicher, T. S., & Kuenzel, D. J. (2016). The elusive effects of trade on growth: Export diversity and economic take‐off. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique. 49(1), 264-295. [https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12197]
  • EU (European Union). (2021). Digital economy and society index (DESI). https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/digital-economy-and-society-index-desi-2021
  • Feenstra, R. C. (1994). New product varieties and the measurement of international prices. The American Economic Review, 84(1), 157–177.
  • Feenstra, R. C., & Ma, H. (2014). Trade facilitation and the extensive margin of exports. Japanese Economic Review, 65(2), 158–177. [https://doi.org/10.1111/jere.12031]
  • Felbermayr, G., & Kohler, W. (2010). Modelling the extensive margin of world trade: New evidence on GATT and WTO membership. The World Economy, 33(4), 1430–1469. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2010.01292.x]
  • Gradillas, M., & Thomas, L. D. W. (2023). Distinguishing digitization and digitalization: A systematic review and conceptual framework. Journal of Product Innovation Management. [https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12690]
  • Hendy, R., & Zaki, C. (2021). Trade facilitation and firms exports: Evidence from customs data. International Review of Economics & Finance, 75, 197–209. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.03.023]
  • Hesse, H. (2009). Export diversification and economic growth. In R. Newfarmer, W. Shaw, & P. Walkenhorst (Eds.), Breaking into new markets: Emerging lessons for export diversification (pp. 55–80). The World Bank.
  • Hornby, G., Goulding, P., & Poon, S. (2002). Perceptions of export barriers and cultural issues: The SME e-Commerce experience. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 3(4), 213–226.
  • Hummels, D., & Klenow, P. J. (2005). The variety and quality of a nation’s exports. American Economic Review, 95(3), 704–723. [https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828054201396]
  • Imbs, J., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Stages of diversification. American Economic Review, 93(1), 63–86. [https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455160]
  • Ismail, N. W. (2020). Digital trade facilitation and bilateral trade in selected Asian countries. Studies in Economics and Finance, 38(2), 257–271. [https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-10-2019-0406]
  • ITU (International Telecommunication Union). (2017). Measuring the information society report. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/mis2017.aspx
  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404511200046]
  • Kehoe, T. J., & Ruhl, K. J. (2013). How important is the new goods margin in international trade? Journal of Political Economy, 121(2), 358–392. [https://doi.org/10.1086/670272]
  • Lewis, G. (2009). The impact of ICT on customs. World Customs Journal, 3(1), 3–11. [https://doi.org/10.55596/001c.91350]
  • Li, F. (2011). Textual analysis of corporate disclosures: A survey of the literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 29(1), 143–165.
  • Liu, C., & Duan, W. (2019). Trade facilitation, firm heterogeneity and multi-product exporters. Journal of International Trade. 5, 72-88.
  • Martincus, C. V., Carballo, J., & Gallo, A. (2011). The impact of export promotion institutions on trade: Is it the intensive or the extensive margin? Applied Economics Letters, 18(4), 127–132. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850903508283]
  • Martincus, C. V., Estevadeordal, A., Gallo, A., & Luna, J. (2010). Information barriers, Export promotion institutions, and the extensive margin of trade. Review of World Economics, 146(1), 91–111. [https://doi.org/10.18235/0011219]
  • Mattoo, A., Rocha, N., & Ruta, M. (2020). The evolution of deep trade agreements (Policy Research Working Paper 9283). World Bank Group. [https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9283]
  • Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467]
  • Mora, J., & Olabisi, M. (2023). Economic development and export diversification: The role of trade costs. International Economics. 173, 102-118. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2022.11.002]
  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2018). Trade facilitation and the global economy. [https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264277571-en]
  • Persson, M. (2013). Trade facilitation and the extensive margin. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 22(5), 658–693. [https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2011.587019]
  • Segura-Cayuela, R., & Vilarrubia, J. M. (2008). The effect of foreign service on trade volumes and trade partners (Banco de España Working Paper No. 0808). SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1126598 [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1126598]
  • Shepherd, B. (2007). Product standards, harmonization, and trade: Evidence from the extensive margin (Policy Research Working Paper 4390). The World Bank. [https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4390]
  • Smeets, M. (Ed.). (2021). Adapting to the digital trade era: challenges and opportunities. World Trade Organization. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/adtera_e.pdf
  • UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). (2019). UNCTAD B2C E-commerce Index. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/tn_unctad_ict4d14_en.pdf
  • UNESCAP (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific). (2017). UN global survey on trade facilitation and paperless trade implementation. https://unnext.unescap.org/content/un-global-survey-trade-facilitation-and-paperless-trade-implementation-2017
  • UNESCAP (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific). (2019). UN global survey on trade facilitation and paperless trade implementation. https://www.untfsurvey.org/report/2019
  • UNESCAP (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific). (2022). Digital and sustainable trade facilitation: Global report 2021. https://www.unescap.org/kp/2022/untf-survey-2021-global
  • Wang, R. & Li, B. (2015). Trade facilitation and export diversification: micro-level mechanism and multinational evidence. Journal of International Trade. 3, 33-43.
  • World Bank. (2014). Implementing trade single windows in Singapore, Colombia and Azerbaijan. In World Bank (Ed.), Doing business 2014: Understanding regulations for small and medium-size enterprises (pp. 60-65). World Bank Publications. [https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9984-2_Case_studies_5]